|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Best viewed with IE 4.0 or later, 1024 X 768.
Introduction My first heatsink review, which was published/posted almost a year ago, was of ThermalRight's now popular SK-6 heatsink. The design featured an all-copper heatsink with very thin fins soldered to the base, creating a relatively small-sized heatsink that performed well. ThermalRight was a fairly new name at that time, and they managed to produce a clear winner with the SK-6. However, competitors were not content with sitting around, and the likes of Alpha and Swiftech soon released their larger-sized heatsinks that could accept 80mm fans to provide better cooling to AMD CPU's, which were constantly increasing in speed and heat output. All the while, ThermalRight seemed to remain quiet despite their market adversaries moves. (ThermalRight did release several other heatsinks after the SK-6, but as far as I can tell, none of them were specifically targetted at the extreme overclocker crowd.) Enter the AX-7, the culmination of ThermalRight's efforts to create an 80mm fan-heatsink that could defeat the other 80mm fan-heatsinks out there. Can ThermalRight's AX-7 live up to the SK-6's legacy? Specifications To increase cooling performance and to properly accommodate an 80mm fan, the AX-7's dimensions are quite a bit different from the SK-6's. The heatsink itself is 77mm x 77mm x 42mm (L x W x H), very close in size to the Alpha PAL8045. (ThermalRight's site lists the height at 80mm, but this is with the addition of a 80mm fan that is 38mm thick, such as the Delta 68cfm fan.) The fan I used for testing (also provided by Bigfoot Computers) was the Panaflo 80mm "H1A" fan that is rated at something like 39.6cfm, and produces a liveable 32dBA of noise. No specific fan is included with the AX-7, so you can make a decision as to what level of performance/noise you want. Or, if you already have a good 80mm fan, you can save by just getting the heatsink.
The design of the AX-7 is quite different than that of the SK-6 but nonetheless is still unique. The aluminum portion features a design with fins radiating outward from the centre, providing ample surface area where there is airflow coming from the fan. There are no fins in the "dead zone" area of the fan, just below where the fan motor resides. This design or at least this concept has been featured on other heatsinks before, such as the Dr. Thermal TI-V77L heatsink I reviewed here sometime ago. The aluminum portion has then been soldered to a copper base or heat spreader that is quite thick. Only testing will tell how good this soldering job was, but if it lives up to the quality of the soldering as seen in the SK-6, I can only expect good results.
Because of its large mass, the AX-7 uses a clip that attaches to all six lugs around the CPU socket for a secure fit and better distribution of pressure. ThermalRight chose not to go the way Alpha and Swiftech did by not utilizing the four mounting holes around the socket for direct attachment to the motherboard rather than to the socket. By doing this, they simplified installation, as it is no longer necessary to remove the motherboard for heatsink installation, whereas for the PAL8045 and MCX462 most people had to. However, this clip is otherwise not much different in that you must still use a screwdriver or other tool to apply pressure to attach the clip to the socket. No matter how many times I've done it, I still don't like having to apply that much pressure around my CPU.
The base itself is 8mm thick and has a very smooth finish, so I'd say that lapping is not needed. The side fins extend out beyond the extent of the base, allowing for air to flow straight down through them. The 80mm fan is supposed to be attached so the air blows down onto the heatsink.
Got News? Send 'em in!
|
|
| |
|