|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best viewed @ 1024 x 768 and higher
Installation & Testing: Working with the IB-NAS4220-B is very, very simple. Like any other drive enclosure, you simply remove a few screws to disassemble the unit. The screws are on the bottom of the unit between the feet. Once those are removed, the outer black housing simply slides off revealing the internal drive cage with the circuits connected at the rear.
You can see that the fan is situated higher up on the back of the unit's frame and isn't obstructed in any major way. Air should be able to easily pass through the drives and over the circuit board. There are two red SATA cables that are situated so that they fit easily on the back of the drives without any need to twist or spin the connectors.
The drives are mounted horizontally one on top of the other. You can see that there are a couple of ways to mount the drives either by screwing in the drive screws manually, or by pre-attaching the rubber grommets and screws first. This way you can simply quickly slide the drives in and out. If you plan on removing the drives often enough, then this is your best choice. The grommets should help limit any noise caused by vibrations. Since I like to use Seagate perpendicular drives with the G-force protection feature, they are pretty much dead silent already. But, it never hurts to think ahead like Icy Box has done here.
Once the drives are fastened and double checked, the internal cage simply slides
back in and is fastened via four black screws on the bottom again. It really
can't get any simpler unless it were a hot-swap style Back Plane unit. The major
differences between this unit and one of those is price. You tend to pay bigger
bucks for Back Planes and they're more configured for much more serious IT
professionals. The
IB-NAS4220-B is a healthy mixture of both Back Planes and end
user features without the high cost.
Now, transfer rates on the NAS4220 depends upon a few factors. One is whether or not you're using a SATA I or SATA II drive which effects the transfer burst rates. SATA II is the optimal drive of choice if you want better results. Also, there will be difference in transfer rates between the selection of RAID you choose. RAID 0 is obviously is a bit faster than RAID 1 as well as JBOD. And, if your network is a bit outdated, you may not obtain similar results since my own network is D-Link Gigabit. Using Seagate SATA II 500GB 16MB hard drives, this particular RAID array experienced transfer rates pretty much expected due to the limited integrated memory. It would probably have been better if this were otherwise. But, then higher amounts of removable or upgradeable SDRAM will drive up the cost.
Working with a larger files revealed better FTP upload speeds averaged of course. These aren't bad results given what the NAS4220 has to work with. Naturally, your results will vary depending on the drives you use and RAID configuration. If you remember, there's more that NAS boxes can do given that you can make use of Linux and other OS that'll allow you to reprogram, or flash, the integrated memory. Here are a couple screen shots of extra projects a friend of mine, code named: Hadaken, decided to try out. He's been a great tutor opening my own eyes to the potentials of NAS.
He's had the Icy Box for a few weeks and has set his up to do various things like use the system as a remote media player for his entire home, scan and convert documents to PDF as well as share them on the NAS. It's been also used as an image gallery where you plug your camera in which shows up as a Mass Storage Device where a press of a button copied the images from the camera and loaded them in to a web gallery built in to the new firmware. (Sweet!)
This is just a simple screen shot
of a transfer in progress to see what kind of speed a new build could achieve.
It's optimized better than the stock firmware which is designed more for Windows
users. Typically, anything I've ever used in Linux has been faster due to lower
resource requirements. Tagan made it decent, but Hadaken made it better. Seeing things like this at work
make you wonder why a NAS unit would come with anything less than at least 256MB
memory. I understand that more memory may mean a higher cost, but older SD
memory shouldn't drive the price of any unit up much at all. It would also be
nice to see memory slots rather than integrated memory. That way we could
replace the memory stick if and when it goes bad. As matter of fact, more
replaceable memory would open any NAS device up to more potential features as
well as make them that much more attractive a storage solution. So, why would Tagan leave off the
eSATA port? Well, for one reason, the
Icy Box isn't meant to be a simple external solution for just
storing your drives and back up files alone. It's a Network Attached Storage
solution with a more serious purpose of sharing and controlling storage space
over your network. This is one reason why there isn't an eSATA port. If you just need
eSATA, Tagan has really decent single and dual drive enclosures.
<< A Closer Look | VH Main Page >>
Got News? Send 'em in!
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |
|