|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best viewed @ 1024 x 768 and higher
Test System:
Two Latency tests were performed which reveals how well the current systems perform over previous generations using lower latency memory. The lower the timings of the memory modules, the quicker data can be accessed and utilized. The higher the timings, the longer memory takes to read and write slowing performance. Depending on the programs and applications being used, average users won't be able to tell the difference between lower and higher latency memory in their system. To better show the benefits of lower latencies, both the Bandwidth and Cache-Memory benchmarks were performed. The Cache-Memory benchmark reveals the benefits from lower latency timings working with your processor. The particular points to notice besides the graph are the Combined Index and Speed Factor. CAS5 timings score 20380 MB/s while CAS4 score 21728 MB/s which is a decent gain. Where all these lower latencies matter is when you use an application
that really pushes the memory to load such as compilation, video, and audio
programs. While the processor will do the bulk of the work, the memory can be a
big help. Often, 3D graphic intensive programs like 3D Rendering and video games
will benefit the faster, lower latency memory. And being that this Patriot
PC2-6400 Extreme is a dual channel 2GB memory kit just adds to the benefits
since large programs can load quicker and experience much less bottle necks. The Patriot PC2-6400LLK Extreme memory held its stock 4-4-4-15 memory timings up to 918MHz using 2.2 volts before reaching its CAS4 limits. The system wasn't completely stable above this frequency, so the memory timings were set to 5-5-5-15. Using 2.3 volts with 5-5-5-15 memory timings, the memory finally topped out at 1000MHz. At this point, the memory's limit had been reached as anything above 1000MHz just couldn't quite pass MemTest no matter how much voltage was used.
Unlinking the Memory and FSB, allows the more aggressive ECS PN2-SLI2 680i Motherboard to maximize the Patriot memory's bandwidth. Rather than post the same results, here is the screen shot of the Sandra Memory Bandwidth results. The memory scored a maximum of 7503 MB/s of bandwidth. It's obvious the memory is capable of more under a killer motherboard platform with a little more voltage. Fear, Code Creatures, and Battlefield 2142 performances revealed that the memory was very stable during the entire test spectrum. The Fear test demo reported 111 and Code Creatures reported 124 average frames per second with the memory at 800MHz. Increasing the memory frequency to 1000MHz, increased Fear's average to 129 frames per second and Code Creatures reported 142 average frames per second. This means if your system needs another 10 to 20 frames to be perfectly playable or you just like more game performance, then you have the extra frequency head room that comes with the Patriot PC2-6400LLK Extreme memory if you want to tap in to its 1000MHz frequency potential. What about thermal or over-voltage issues? Of course,
the memory will emit a little more heat when running at 1000MHz, but it won't be as though you are
trying to overclock regular memory that is specified for 800MHz operations only. That's really
when heat and stability issues pop up. In the case of the
Patriot PC2-6400LLK
Extreme Performance memory,
it's already built in. Patriot expects you to eventually
push the memory farther than the standard specifications. With all these things
considered, the answer is simply, there aren't any.
<< Intro & Specs | VH Main Page >>
Got News? Send 'em in!
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |
|