|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best viewed @ 1024 x 768 and higher
Introduction: A few days ago, I had the pleasure of testing out one of Kingston's Value RAM
2x1GB Kits which presented a good basic benchmark and test result of what DDR3
holds in store for the newest Intel based systems. Most of the Intel support
surrounds the motherboards and memory modules that support the 1333MHz FSB
processors which are out now. While there is really nothing wrong with the
1066MHz Core 2 Duo processors still on many of the shelves, the newer processor
has just as much, if not better, a chance of continuing to impress in terms of
performance and overclocking. Specifications:
As you may already know, DDR3 modules use a little less power than DDR2 which replaced the aging DDR that also consumed way more power. At 1.7v to 1.8v, thermal issues caused by the memory modules is greatly reduced and those stock RAM sinks are once again capable of cooling the kits. The biggest difference is still and will always depend on the memory timings each module is capable of operating under. Given that DDR3 memory timings can reach 10-10-10 for value based RAM, users serious about their program, game, and benchmark performances will want at least a set of 7-7-7 modules such as the ones being tested. << Back to VH FrontPage | A Closer Look >>
Got News? Send 'em in!
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |
|