|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best viewed @ 1024 x 768 and higher
More Testing:
Several different make, model, and frequency memory modules were used to test the Auto settings. The motherboard recognized and worked with each CAS 4 PC2-6400, PC2-7200, PC2-8500, and PC2-9200 module without any boot or timing issues at all. It's not very common anymore these days that a memory module is incompatible with a particular motherboard. Typically, default voltages set by the BIOS tend to be the common culprit for instability, reboots, and blue screens. It has been a very long time since I personally have seen a blue screen using the many various types of hardware. The AB9 Quad GT definitely passes my biggest concern in regards to stability and compatibility using random makes of memory.
Going manually with all the BIOS settings, the memory divider was dropped and the FSB was increased resulting in a 450MHz Bus straight out which is by all current 'straight-out-of-the-box' standards, simply exceptional. This is a whole new top overclock for this test bench when it comes to that standard. The maximum reachable and bootable overclock was 490MHz which wasn't quite a 100% stable, but was very, very close. I figure with a bit more maximizing of the VTT and Chipset voltages, that the platform could be stable. It would finish various benchmark tests within Sisoft Sandra Pro-XI, but it randomly had issues running 3DMark05. There are just so many possibilities when considering the many adaptable BIOS settings that could improve or degrade the overclocking stability of a motherboard. If you've been wondering what all of Abit's Silent OTES is about, here are a couple of screen shots just to show you an example of how well the OTES can keep the PWM components cool. Even the chipset benefits from the OTES heat pipes. The temps are also the result of using a capable CPU cooler that can blow air directly down on to the heat sinks. The OTES alone keep the temperatures under 50 C typically. But, adding a little more cooling such as the Ultra-X CPU Cooler, the temperatures are drastically lowered. If your motherboard has passive heat sinks and is capable of overclocking, you might want to consider something along the same lines of cooling. It may very well be what has been holding your motherboard's ability back. Conclusion: Going back to the design features, the Quad GT has all of those things and more. At no point during any of the testing and repeated changes did the platform error or give cause for the slightest concern. The motherboard seems almost self aware, if you will, and handled every change and system test efficiently. The only time the platform could be brought to boot failure was during some extravagant overclocking testing. What was even more surprising is that often the system would attempt to boot, but wasn't quite Windows stable. Basically, the motherboard seemed more willing than Windows. Changing up hard drive and starting with another fresh OS installation brought about a little better results in regards to overclocking. Stock performance is very comparable to its distant cousin, the IN9 32X-MAX
boasting the NVidia 680i chipset. As a matter of fact, there are so many similar
features between the two that at one point I thought, just for a second, that I
was still working on the the IN9 32X-MAX given that both have the rear CMOS
Reset Switch, LEDs, and similar sockets and ports. One thing that makes the Quad
GT stand out is how extremely stable the motherboard remains under many
different memory modules. When the BIOS was properly configured, the platform
would auto detect the memory and adjust the CPU Front Side Bus accordingly to
match the memory frequency. All the various memory modules all defaulted to
their frequency specification automatically and booted without issue. This was
something the IN9-32X didn't quite get correct every time.
Got News? Send 'em in!
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |
|